I’ve had one of those moments that lives rent free in your head, and wanted to write this post to see whether it resonated with anyone else.​
​
It was one of those quietly confronting moments; the kind where you’re with someone close to you, but the connection feels just out of reach. Spiky energy, eye rolling, sharp words… and the room starts to fill not with warmth, but with a kind of armour.​
​
It got me thinking about Barry Goldwater’s quote: ‘To disagree, one doesn’t have to be disagreeable.’ Simple. Direct. And perhaps more relevant than ever in a world that often associates conviction with combat.​
​
What struck me wasn’t the disagreement – it was the edge with which it was delivered. When we lead, when we love, when we care, how we show up becomes the message. We can disagree. We can stand firm. But when tone and body language take over substance, trust begins to erode and with it, the space for reflection and dialogue.​
​
I don’t write this to finger-point. I write it as a gentle nudge to myself, and perhaps to others, to notice the ripple effect of our responses. ​
​
Spiky interactions often signal something deeper and maybe the kindest thing we can do is pause, stay curious, and ask: ​
​
🤔 What’s behind the defensiveness?

🤔 What’s being protected or unsaid?​
​
Grace doesn’t mean that we have to be passive. It means choosing the tone that matches our values, even when the stakes feel personal.​
​
Can you think back to a recent disagreement?

What was the tone? ​

Did it invite trust or trigger defensiveness? ​

What was your body language saying? ​

If you could rewind and choose one different way to respond, what would it be? And which of your own values would you be expressing through that choice?​